eug|

revistas electrónicas de la Universidad de Granada

Política editorial

Temática y alcance

MUNDO ESLAVO publica contribuciones científicas en el área de los estudios eslavos en inglés, español o en cualquier lengua eslava. Está abierta a toda una variedad de temas de carácter general o específico, así como de métodos didácticos, perspectivas teóricas y comparadas y cuestiones de traducción. Cada número cuenta con una sección de reseñas de libros recientemente aparecidos.

Mundo Eslavo se encuentra indexada en:

  • ERIH PLUS
  • MLA - Modern Language Association Database
  • Lingistic Bibliography
  • ProQuest (ProQuest Social Science Journals, IBSS: International Bibliography of the Social Sciences)
  • Linguistics Abstracts Online
  • LATINDEX (catálogo)
  • DIALNET
  • DICE
  • e-Revistas
  • DOAJ
  • ULRICH'S

 

Política de secciones

Artículos

Marcado Envíos abiertos Marcado Indexado Marcado Revisión por pares

150º aniversario de la publicación de la obra “Crimen y castigo” de Dostoievski

Marcado Envíos abiertos Marcado Indexado Marcado Revisión por pares

Miscelánea

Marcado Envíos abiertos Marcado Indexado Marcado Revisión por pares

Estudios Literatura

Marcado Envíos abiertos Marcado Indexado Marcado Revisión por pares

Estudios Didáctica

Marcado Envíos abiertos Marcado Indexado Marcado Revisión por pares

Estudios Traductología

Marcado Envíos abiertos Marcado Indexado Marcado Revisión por pares

Estudios Historia y Cultura

Marcado Envíos abiertos Marcado Indexado Marcado Revisión por pares

Reseñas

Marcado Envíos abiertos Marcado Indexado Marcado Revisión por pares

Presentación de libros

Marcado Envíos abiertos Sin marcar Indexado Sin marcar Revisión por pares

Documentos

Marcado Envíos abiertos Sin marcar Indexado Sin marcar Revisión por pares

Novedades Editoriales

Marcado Envíos abiertos Sin marcar Indexado Sin marcar Revisión por pares

Eslavistica en España

Marcado Envíos abiertos Sin marcar Indexado Sin marcar Revisión por pares

Bienvenidos a...

Marcado Envíos abiertos Sin marcar Indexado Sin marcar Revisión por pares
 

Proceso de revisión por pares

MUNDO ESLAVO es una revista internacional de libre acceso con sistema de revisión por pares ciegos. Los manuscritos enviados a Mundo Eslavo deben estar escritos en inglés, español o en cualquiera de las lenguas eslavas y no puede haber sido aceptado, publicado o haber sido enviado para su publicación en ningún otro lugar.

 

Política de acceso abierto

Esta revista provee acceso libre inmediato a su contenido bajo el principio de que hacer disponible gratuitamente la investigación al publico, lo cual fomenta un mayor intercambio de conocimiento global.

 

Archivado

Esta revista utiliza el sistema LOCKSS para crear un archivo distribuido entre las bibliotecas participante, permitiendo a dichas bibliotecas crear archivos permanentes de la revista con fines de preservación y restauración. Ampliar información...

 

Administración e intercambios

Departamento de Filología Griega (Área de Filología Eslava), Facultad de Filosofía y Letras.
Universidad de Granada.
Campus Universitario de Cartuja, 18071.Granada.

Responsable:
Ángel Díaz Pintado Hilario.
e-mail: aediazpin@hotmail.com

 

Distribución y suscripciones

EDITORIAL DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE GRANADA.

Antiguo Colegio Máximo. Campus Universitario de Cartuja
18071- Granada.

Tlf. (958)243930

http://editorialugr.com

 

Periodicidad

Anual

 

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Mundo Eslavo abides by the Committee on Publication Ethics' (COPE) Code of Conduct and aim to adhere to its Best Practice Guidelines. Authors are expected to be aware of, and comply with, best practice in publication ethics, specifically with regard to authorship, dual submission, plagiarism, figure manipulation, competing interests, and compliance with standards of research ethics. Any concerns about the above should be addressed to mundoeslavo [at] mundoeslavo.com.

Ethics and Malpractice Statement

The publication of an article in the double-blind peer-reviewed journal Mundo Eslavo is a reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing, including the authors, the peer-reviewers, the journal editors and the publisher. This publication ethics and malpractice statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

DUTIES OF AUTHORS

Authorship of the paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper, without fabrication, falsification or inappropriate data manipulation. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review and professional publication articles should also be accurate and objective, and editorial 'opinion' works should be clearly identified as such.

Data access and retention

Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and, if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Data, text, figures or ideas originated by other researchers should be properly acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication

The authors must guarantee: (1) that the article has not been published elsewhere; (2) it is not being considered for publication elsewhere; and (3) that it has been submitted with the full knowledge and approval of the institution or organization given as the affiliation of the authors. Submission of multi-authored manuscripts implies the consent of each of the authors.

If data from the article is used, partially or entirely, in other research articles, or the data and results represent only part of a bigger research project described in multiple publications, these must be clearly presented to the editor.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Examples of potential conflicts of interest which should be disclosed include employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest stage possible.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author's obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper. If the editor or the publisher learns from a third party that a published work contains a significant error, it is the obligation of the author to promptly.

DUTIES OF EDITOR

Publication decisions

The editor-in-chief of Mundo Eslavo is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal and approved by at least two external reviewers should be published. The editor-in-chief may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor-in-chief confers with other editors or reviewers in making this decision. They evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.

Editors should recuse themselves (should ask a co-editor, associate editor or other member of the editorial board instead to review and consider) from considering manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Response to ethical issues

An editor should take reasonably responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper, in conjunction with the publisher.

DUTIES OF REVIEWERS

Contribution to editorial decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. Any selected expert who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and conflict of interest

Reviewers and editors are required to declare any and all potential conflicts of interest. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Publication Fee

Mundo Eslavo does not charge authors for any submission, article-processing or publication fee. Thus, publication is absolutely free. Mundo Eslavo provides immediate open access to its contents on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge (see Copyright Notice here).

 



ISSN: 1579-8372 | eISSN: 2255-517X